Using Propensity Scores to Adjust Weights to Compensate for Dwelling Unit Level Nonresponse in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). MEPS, a complex national probability sample survey, is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates of health care use, expenditures, sources of payment, and insurance coverage for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. It comprises three component surveys with the Household Component (HC) as the core survey. The MEPS-HC, like most sample surveys, experiences unit nonresponse despite efforts to maximize response rates. Survey nonresponse is usually compensated for by some form of weighting adjustment to reduce the bias in survey estimates. Currently, a weighting class nonresponse adjustment using socio-economic and demographic variables to create the weighting classes is used in the MEPS to adjust for potential nonresponse bias at the dwelling unit level. An alternative method for forming nonresponse adjustment cells is to use response propensities. This paper summarizes research undertaken to investigate various potential use of response propensities to adjust weights to compensate for nonresponse in the MEPS. Survey estimates for selected survey components, CVs, distribution of weights, and nonresponse adjustment methods at the dwelling unit level are compared and methodological issues discussed. Lap-Ming Wun Statistician, Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 E-mail: [email protected] Trena M. Ezzati-Rice, Robert Baskin, Janet Greenblatt, Marc Zodet Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 Frank Potter, Nuria Diaz-Tena, and Mourad Touzani Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
منابع مشابه
Estimating Variance of the Sample Mean in Two-phase Sampling with Unit Non-response Effect
In sample surveys, we always deal with two types of errors: Sampling error and non-sampling error. One of the most common non-sampling errors is nonresponse. This error happens when some sample units are not observed or viewed but they do not answer some of the questions. The complete prevention of this error is not possible, but it can be significantly reduced. The non-response causes bias and ...
متن کاملAn Application of Non-response Bias Reduction Using Propensity Score Methods
In many statistical studies some units do not respond to a number or all of the questions. This situation causes a problem called non-response. Bias and variance inflation are two important consequences of non-response in surveys. Although increasing the sample size can prevented variance inflation, but cannot necessary adjust for the non-response bias. Therefore a number of methods ...
متن کامل1985: Compensating for Wave Nonresponse in the 1979 Isdp Research Panel
The choice between weighting adjustments and imputation for handling missing survey data is generally straightforward: as a rule, weighting adjustments are used for total nonresponse and imputation is used for item nonresponses. There are, however, several situations where the choice is debatable. In general, these are situations of what might be termed partial nonresponse, where some data are ...
متن کاملUsing Contact History Information to Adjust for Nonresponse in the Current Population Survey
The Current Population Survey (CPS) adjusts the sampling weights for nonresponse to match population controls based on cells which combine similar primary sampling units (PSU) based on size and urbanicity. The adjustment method assumes that the nonresponse is random within the adjustment cells. This adjustment increases weights for responding units in PSUs with higher nonresponse. The present s...
متن کاملGeneralizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.
OBJECTIVE To provide a tutorial for using propensity score methods with complex survey data. DATA SOURCES Simulated data and the 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. STUDY DESIGN Using simulation, we compared the following methods for estimating the treatment effect: a naïve estimate (ignoring both survey weights and propensity scores), survey weighting, propensity score methods (nearest ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004